These Americans return to Iraq as Christian warriors against Islamic State

Some say they’ve come to fight for their religion — others just to fight. But their first battle is with Iraqi bureaucracy. Feb. 25, 2015 Brett, a 28-year-old U.S. Army veteran who asked that his last name be withheld, walks the streets with Dwekh Nawsha, a recently founded Christian militia in Iraq’s Nineveh province. The militia says they have requests from veterans and volunteers from the United States to Australia. Ayman Oghanna/For The Washington Post

In a smoky living room in a makeshift military headquarters, Brett, a former U.S. serviceman with tattoos of Jesus etched on his forearms, explained how he hopes to help keep the church bells of Iraq ringing.

“Jesus tells us what you do unto the least of them, you do unto me,” said the 28-year-old from Detroit who served an extended tour in Iraq in 2006 and 2007. He asked for his surname not to be published, to protect his family at home. “I couldn’t sit back and watch what was happening, women being raped and sold wholesale.”

So in December he traveled to northern Iraq, where he joined a growing band of foreigners leaving behind their lives in the West to fight with new Christian militias against the Islamic State extremist group. The leaders of those militias say they have been swamped with hundreds of requests from veterans and volunteers from around the world who want to join them.

Read more, Washington Post

Americans’ views increasingly hawkish on terrorism, ISIS

 

DATE IMPORTED:November 24, 2014Iraqi Shi'ite fighters pose with an Islamic State flag which they pulled down on the front line in Jalawla, Diyala province, November 23, 2014. Iraqi forces said on Sunday they retook two towns north of Baghdad from Islamic State fighters, driving them from strongholds they had held for months and clearing a main road from the capital to Iran. Picture taken November 23, 2014.Last week, I posted a piece laying out the emerging evidence that the American people are shifting toward a more hawkish view of how we should respond to foreign threats, especially terrorism.  A Quinnipiac University poll released today underscores that shift.

As economic worries gradually subside, concern about terrorism is on the rise.  The survey finds that terrorism now trails only the economy on the list of top public priorities.  67 percent of the people regard ISIS as a “major threat” to the security of the United States.

The public is not satisfied with the Obama administration’s response to this threat.  Only 39 percent approve of the president’s handling of terrorism, down from 52 percent a year ago, while 54 percent disapprove.  And when it comes to ISIS, the public’s view is even more negative: only 35 percent approve of the president’s approach; 55 percent disapprove.

These sentiments translate into broad support for much more assertive policies.  The Quinnipiac survey found that by a stunning margin of 62 to 30 percent, the American people now support sending U.S. ground troops to fight ISIS in Iraq and Syria.  That figure includes majorities of Democrats and Independents as well as Republicans, women as well as men, and young adults as well as seniors.  And 68 percent are “very confident” or “somewhat confident” that the United States and its allies can defeat ISIS.

Although the American people are aware of the risks, they have reached a judgment about where the greater risk lies.  53 percent are concerned that the U.S. response “will not go far enough” in stopping ISIS, versus only 39 percent who fear that we will go too far.

The public is less united on this point than on sending ground troops, however.  Women are more concerned than men about the possibility of overreaching; Americans under age 35 are more concerned than those over 35; and by a margin of 58 to 32 percent, Democrats are afraid of going too far.

Still, neither the congress nor the president can afford to ignore the rising public demand for a tougher response to ISIS.  Despite divisions among elected officials about the precise terms of a new authorization to use military force, members of congress would be well advised to hold hearings as soon as possible and resolve their disagreements expeditiously.  As for the president, Mr. Obama could be one beheading or immolation away from having his hand forced by a public that has grown increasingly impatient with halfway measures.

Those of us who lived through the 1973-1979 epoch, bookended by our evacuation from Vietnam and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, have seen this movie before, and it ended badly for doves.   It’s not 2009 anymore.  Welcome to the post-post-Iraq era.

via Brookings Topics – Iraq http://ift.tt/18RQHLC

Politics and US Competitiveness

Last night, I entered a Facebook thread, where Republicans and Democrats were stereotyping each other–taking the actions of one or two politicians and generalizing them to everyone in their particular party.  I responded this way:

It is extremely frustrating to see the national attention consumed by the issues of passionate fools on both the extreme right and left that wish to enforce their views of propriety on the rest of us. What unites them–the loony left and wacko right–is that they both wish to use government to regulate areas of life that are wholly inappropriate for government to do.

So what do we get–right wing politicians that write laws to restrict rights they do not like and left wing politicians that write laws to restrict rights they do not like. Both now buy into larger and larger government to enforce their will on the non-political class. Political parties shrink, but write laws to protect the permanency of their politicians, and most Americans find themselves at odds with a significant amount of what their government does. To cement their positions, these politicians find some stupid issue to build a career on–and people vote for these things as they are spun into a frenzy.

The important stuff (tax, education, regulation, solvency, etc.), which affects our nation’s place in the world becomes radioactive and is left on the table. Take a look at the table in the linked article in the Economist–it’s a couple of years old but still relevant. It is based on a survey on US competitiveness that has been done for at least a decade by HBS. Look at the table on the second page. Where is the US viewed to be lagging its competitors and getting worse–tax code, legal framework, political system, regulation, macro policy, and K-12 education system.

Untitled

 

These are the things our politicians should be dealing with–note they are ALL in the appropriate realm of government and most of them have been damaged by government. Democrats and Republicans are equally at fault here–just about different things.

–BB

Homeland Security chief: Be ‘vigilant’ at malls

Mall of America in Bloomington, Minn., heightened security after a video threatening a terrorist attack was released purportedly by a Somali militant group with ties to al-Qaeda. (Photo: Jim Mone, AP)

A video terror threat apparently came from the Somali militant group al-Shabaab.

via USATODAY – News Top Stories http://ift.tt/1Ay4qQs

Turkey and US agree to train and arm Syrian rebels in fight against Isis

Rebel fighters drive a tank near the frontline in the village of Ratyan in the Syrian countryside on Thursday. Photograph: Zein Al-Rifai/AFP/Getty Images

Training could begin as early as next month at base in Turkey

Turkish officials suggest trained rebels could also target Syrian government

Turkey and the United States signed an agreement Thursday to train and arm Syrian rebels fighting the Islamic State group, said the US embassy in Ankara.

The two countries have been in talks about such a pact for several months. The deal was signed on Thursday by US ambassador John Bass and Turkish foreign ministry undersecretary Feridun Sinirlioglu, said embassy spokesman Joe Wierichs. He gave no further details.

Related: Syrians have been oppressed by a dictator and jihadists, and bombed by the west – and you call us terrorists? | Zaina Erhaim

Continue reading… via Syria | The Guardian http://ift.tt/1LfJq3X

Obama, Republicans and the media concur: it’s time for war with Isis | Trevor Timm

It’s sounding like the Bush years all over again: the administration and Congress want a war and the media’s happy to cover it as the government prefers

After more than six months of virtually ignoring the fact that the war against Isis was illegal by almost anyone’s standards – given Congress’s cowardly refusal vote on it and the White House’s refusal to ask them first – the Obama administration has finally submitted a draft war authorization against Isis to Congress.

That means the media can go back to doing what it does best: creating a “debate” over how many countries we should invade, without any discussion of how our invasions created the very situation in which we feel we have to contemplate more invasions. It’s like the early Bush years all over again.

Dear Congress: I humbly request the authority to do whatever the hell I want even though I already have the authority to do it anyway. Love, Barack.

Continue reading…

via Syria | The Guardian http://ift.tt/1AkRVHZ